Long-Range Wireless Gate Annunciator
Read the original article for background.
This page describes a different way to detect a vehicle or pedestrian entering through the gate: the microwave motion sensor. While the installed PIR sensor works 99% of the time, there are occasions when it doesn't, usually during precipitation events (heavy snowfall, rain, drizzle). This gave me an incentive to investigate another interesting approach. The device described uses the HB100 microwave motion sensor. These are incredibly cheap: available on eBay for as little as $3. A microwave motion sensor differs from a PIR sensor in that it's an active device. Whereas the PIR sensor monitors ambient (IR) radiation impinging on the device, the microwave sensor radiates a low-power microwave beam and monitors the signal reflected from objects.
The HB100 consists of a 10.525 GHz dielectric resonance oscillator (DRO), transmit antenna, receive antenna and Schottky diode receive mixer/detector. If an object within range is moving relative to the sensor, the reflected signal will differ slightly in frequency from the transmitted signal (the "Doppler effect"). The frequency shift depends directly on the target's speed as seen by the sensor - the greater the relative speed, the greater the shift. The received signal is mixed with a sample of the transmitted signal to derive a difference signal. The difference signal appears at the sensor's IF output pin.
The sensor requires an amplifier/filter/rectifier to complete the system. Figure 1 shows the circuit, derived mostly from this application note. It consists of a sample-and-hold input stage, variable gain filter/amplifier, full-wave rectifier and output buffer transistor.
The motion sensor is operated in pulse mode to minimize power consumption, important when the power supply is a battery. The 7555 (U2), a CMOS version of the 555, generates 20 µS pulses at 0.5 mS intervals (2 kHz 4% duty cycle). The sensor radiates only when the output pin (3) of U2 is low. This results in a 25:1 reduction in average power consumed by the sensor module, and a reduction (by 14 dB) in average radiated power. After adding in the power consumed by U2, average current draw is about 5 mA, compared to 50 mA the sensor would draw in continuous mode. (See CW circuit.)
Pulse mode could be thought of as a form of spread-spectrum, a technique used in wireless communications systems to minimize interference. The synchronous sample-and-hold input to the IF amplifier operates as a 'matched filter' to de-spread the received signal, making it appear to the amplifier/filter as a continuous, low-frequency signal. This compensates for the reduced transmitter power and may provide some interference rejection. Note that the sample-hold transistor (2N2222) operates in reverse active mode during part of the sample cycle. [Google: "bjt reverse active mode"]
The IF signal from the sensor is amplified and filtered by opamps U1a and U1b. Gain can be adjusted from about 3000 to 30,000 (~70-90 dB). Frequency response is ~5-50 Hz, making the sensor most sensitive to speeds in the range of 0.15 to 1.5 MPH (0.25-2.5 km/h), walking speed. (For more on the speed range issue, see 'Lessons Learned' below). The output of U1b is fed to U1c and U1d. When the signal exceeds 2 volts peak-to-peak amplitude, one or both 1N914 diodes conduct, charging the 100 µF capacitor and turning on the NPN output transistor. The output is pulled to ground when a moving object is detected.
IF Amplifier Gain vs Frequency
See the original article for complete details of the remote sensor installation.
Update: Lessons Learned
*PIR and Microwave Sensor Compared
Choosing Cars over Critters
As it turns out, the microwave motion sensor out-performs the PIR sensor in this application. It reliably detects moving vehicles and animals during damp weather events (rain/drizzle) when the PIR sensor is not effective. I took advantage of the microwave sensor's uniform performance and lowered its sensitivity setting to a point where cars are detected but critters are not. The reason? Deer are thick around here. Herds tend to move in single file and a herd of 10 travelling through the gate might trip the system 5-10 times as they come through (annoying). Yes, by lowering the sensor's sensitivity I am choosing to ignore pedestrians (human critters) but, this being a rural location, visitors very rarely if ever arrive on foot. The ability to detect pedestrians can be restored to the sensor if needed simply by readjusting the sensitivity setting upward.
Schematics produced with DCCAD.